Studies of Passive Clauses

By Paul M. Postal

Subjects: Linguistics
Series: SUNY series in Linguistics
Paperback : 9780887060847, 286 pages, November 1985
Hardcover : 9780887060830, 286 pages, November 1985

Alternative formats available from:

Table of contents

Preface
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1. Introduction
1. 1 Background
1. 2 Passive Clauses
1. 3 Impersonal Passive Clauses
1. 4 Relevant Aspects of Arc Pair Grammar
1. 4.1 Remarks
1. 4.2 Nonconstructive Grammars
1. 4.3 Some Rule Notations
1. 4.4 Pair Networks
1. 5 A Theoretical Note
Notes

Chapter 2. Virtues of a Universal Account of Passives
2. 1 Two Virtues of a Universal View of Passives
2. 2 Some Lawful Properties of Passive Clauses
2. 2.1 Double Passives
2. 2.2 Passives of Unaccusatives
2. 2.3 Passives of Inversion Clauses
2. 2.4 Passives of Impersonal Clauses
2. 2.5 Summary
2. 3 Facilitating the Statement of Language-Particular Restrictions
2. 3.1 Remarks
2. 3.2 Apparently Anomalous French Personal Passives
2. 3.2 Postscript
2. 3.3 A Restriction in Ancient Greek
2. 3.4 A Restriction in Modern Greek
2. 3.5 A Restriction in Korean
2. 3.5 Postscript
2. 3.6 Quiché Instrumental Advancement
2. 3.7 Agreement and Passives in Chichewa
2. 3.7 Postscript
2. 3.8 Agreement and Passives in Chi-Mwi:ni
2. 3.9 Halkomelem Passives and Raising
2. 3.10 Summary
Notes

Chapter 3. The Inadequacy of the Relational Grammar Account of Impersonal Passives
3. 1 The Relational Grammar View
3. 2 English Personal Passives with Dummies Advanced from 2 to 1
3. 3 French Personal Passives with Dummies Advanced from 2 to 1
3. 4 More English Personal Passives Involving Advanced Dummies
3. 5 Summary
Notes

Chapter 4. An Arc Pair Grammar Definition of Impersonal Passives
4. 1 The Arc Pair Grammar View of Clause Structure and the Problem of Impersonal Passives
4. 2 Ghost Arcs and Dummy Nominals
4. 3 Ghost Sponsors and the Characterization of Impersonal Passives
4. 4 An Argument Distinguishing French Impersonal Passives from Certain 'Impersonal' Personal Passives
4. 5 Formalizing the Subjunctive Restriction
4. 6 Reflexive Passives
4. 7 Reflexive Impersonal Passives and the Subjunctive Restriction
4. 7 Postscript
4. 8 The Ghost Arc Law and a Fundamental Property of Impersonal Passives
4. 9 Rules Involving Passive Clauses
Notes

Chapter 5. Apparent Impersonal Passives of Unaccusative Structures and Possible Violations of the 1AEX
5. 1 Remarks
5. 2 Turkish
5. 2 Postscript
5. 3 Extensions of Passive Morphology
5. 4 Sanskrit
5. 5 Nerbonne's Critique
5. 5.1 Lithuanian
5. 5.1 Postscript
5. 5.2 Irish
5. 5.3 Estonian
5. 5.4 Lithuanian and German Medio-passives
5. 6 Summary
5. 7 A Note on Italian
Notes

Chapter 6. English Pseudo-Passives
6. 1 Background
6. 2 An Arc Pair Grammar Analysis of Pseudo-Passives
6. 3 Arguments for 'Reanalysis'
6. 4 The Pseudo-Passive Control Rule
6. 5 An Alternative Arc Pair Grammar View of Pseudo-Passives
6. 5.1 The Issue
6. 5.2 Blocking Pseudo-Passives with Any 2 Arc
6. 5.3 Some Earlier Observations
6. 5.4 Some Demotion Paradigms
6. 6 Open Questions
6. 6.1 Other Constraints Limiting the Class of Pseudo-Passives
6. 6.2 Additional Complex Passives
Notes

Chapter 7. Generalized Passive Clauses
7. 1 Remarks
7. 2 Theoretical Modification
7. 3 Weaker Constraints on Prepassive Arcs
7. 4 The Scope of Non-2 Prepassive Arcs
Notes

References
Index

Description

In this work, Paul M. Postal supports the universalist theory of language by examining passive clauses. Contrary to a skeptical tradition, Postal argues that passive clauses are cross-linguistically identifiable and characterizable. This study proposes refinements of the analysis of the natural language grammatical category Passive Clause. These refinements include an account of the notion 'dummy nominal,' central to the analysis of impersonal passive clauses; additions permitting a proper typology of the major known subtypes of Passive Clause; a generalization permitting application to clauses whose subjects are not earlier level direct objects; and, construction of precise rule concepts to represent restrictions on passive clauses.

The passive domain supports the universalist approach in three distinguishable ways: (1) by permitting formulation of otherwise apparently unstatable lawful characteristics of all passive structures; (2) by facilitating statement of language-specific passive constraints holding in diverse languages; and, (3) by allowing uniform statement in grammars of recurrent constraints on passives. Each mode of support is applied to actual cases based on material from more than a dozen languages from English and French to Quiche (Mayan) and Chi-Mwi:ni (Bantu).

Paul Martin Postal is a Research Staff Member at IBM's T. J. Watson Research Center. He has also taught linguistics at MIT and the City University of New York. Postal has written numerous articles and books, including Constituent Structure, Cross-Over Phenomena, Arc Pair Grammar (with D. E. Johnson).

Reviews

"It will be the best introduction to arc pair grammar (APG) available, and as such will be a standard work for anyone who wishes to learn something about this framework. " — Geoffrey K. Pullum, Cowell College, University of California at Santa Cruz

"Postal provides a detailed crosslinguistic account of a construction-type that has long been at the center of syntactic investigation but has resisted real explanation so far. The book will be of great interest to anyone working on grammatical relations, regardless of their particular theoretical leanings. " — Mark Aronoff, State University of New York at Stony Brook